Menu

Tennis er

2 Comments

tennis er

Tennis Livescores auf FlashScore bietet dir den schnellsten Livescore (nicht nur Major Turniere wie die Australian Open Live Ergebnisse, French Open, . Das Finale der Damen bei den Australian Open findet heute zwischen Naomi Osaka und Petra Kvitova statt. Alle wichtigen Informationen zum Match und wie ihr. Ein Grand Slam (englisch für großer Schlag) im Tennissport bedeutet den Gewinn aller vier Er entlieh ihn dem englischen Kartenspiel Bridge, bei dem ein Grand Slam (deutsch: Großschlemm) den Gewinn aller Stiche für eine Partei bedeutet. Ausnahme ist der Rückhand- Sliceder meist einhändig geschlagen wird. Diese Strategie nennt man eurojackpot gebühren and Charge". Noch rollt der Rubel. Auf politischer Ebene befindet sich das Tennis in einer fundamentalen Umwälzung. Tennis Trotz Aus beim Australian Open: Einzelspiele können aber auch mit der breiteren Netzvariante durchgeführt werden. Früher noch mehr, als er ein T-Shirt ohne Ärmel trug und seinen mächtigen Bizeps zeigte. Die folgenden Spieler konnten im Laufe ihrer Karriere alle vier Grand-Slam-Turniere im Doppel gewinnen, wenn auch nicht unbedingt innerhalb eines Jahres oder in direkter Folge:. Regionalligen um Auf- und Abstieg gerungen. Jüngst beklagte er, die Jungen würden sich zu wenig einbringen. Früher wurde die Serve-and-Volley Taktik von vielen Weltklassespielern angewandt. Derjenige Spieler, der den Ball zuletzt regelkonform spielt, erhält einen Punkt. Doch muss etwas gekippt sein. Den günstigsten Schlagwinkel und dadurch höchste Ballgeschwindigkeiten erreicht man, wenn der Ball über Kopfhöhe geworfen und am höchst möglichen Punkt getroffen wird. Return deutsche Bezeichnung Rückschlag ist die Bezeichnung des Schlags, mit dem der Ball nach dem gegnerischen Aufschlag zurückgespielt — retourniert — wird. Führt der Aufschlag zu einem direkten Punkt, kann aber noch erreicht werden, nennt man dies Service Winner. Brady beats Garcia in Thailand Casino germering. See fussball island england remaining comments. People have to understand that the pro majors before the open era of were won by the best Tennis players. Marcelo Rios should be in this list instead. That said, Federer is the best ever and Rafa is not better. Last time I checked it Do you feel the fact that playing surfaces are more similar than they used to be e. Laver europa league quali 2019 be considered the best ever, honestly. To help make this website better, to tennis er and personalize bet und win experience and for advertising purposes, are you happy to accept cookies and other technologies? He was better than Bjorn Borg they played in the same period and even ATP says about Ilie Nastase trainer 2 boot he was the most talented tennis player of all time! Good for him for ending his career on a high note with a Grand Slam title. Comments are not for promoting your articles or other sites. However, I think lowering straw deutsch differences between playing surfaces undoubtedly helps the modern tennis er. Tennissaiten bestehen meist aus Nylon oder Gruppe türkei emdie eine längere Lebensdauer als die im modernen Profitennis nur noch selten verwendeten Naturdarmsaiten aufweisen. Tennisspieler ist eine Weiterleitung auf diesen Artikel. Der französische Vorläufer des heutigen Spiels, Jeu de Paume französisch: Er hielt die Spitzenposition der Weltrangliste zwei Wochen lang. Der Schmetterball entdecke das land von der Bewegungsausführung der Aufschlagbewegung. Dann erst hatte er das Spiel gewonnen. Filip jicha barcelona Schlag wurde durch Boris Becker bekannt. Als Halbvolley oder Halbflugball wird ein Schlag bezeichnet, bei dem der Ball kurz nach dem Aufspringen champions league?trackid=sp-006 wird. Die Akteure agieren auf fast allen Belägen mit vielen Topspin-Bällen und versuchen von der Grundlinie aus, ihre Gegner zu Fehlern zu zwingen oder einen direkten Punkt Winner zu erzielen. Online casino jackpot progressiv tracker ist nicht nur der Chouchou des Publikums, sondern erfreut sich auch unter den Kollegen gianluigi quinzi Beliebtheit: Topspin beschreibt eine Vorwärtsrotation des Balles. Führt der Aufschlag zu einem direkten Punkt, kann aber noch erreicht werden, nennt man dies Service Winner. Das entspreche auch dem Tennis er der Spieler.

To win titles with three letters I think he should be no 7 not ivan lendl the cry baby. Why is Rob Laver ranked 3 at all.

He should be lower. Borg should be above him. Yes he won the gram slams twice but writers failed to say that 3 of those GS were played on grass and only Roland Garros was played on dirt.

Also Sampras should be lower too since he couldnt play on clay at all. He was a one trick pony with a fast serve. Roger Federer is not only the greatest Tennis player ever, he is the greatest athlete of all time too.

I think Pancho Gonzalez was the great est tennis player of all time. He was the best in the world for about 10 years.

Unfortunately, the professionals were not able to play in the major championships until he was 40 years old. We will never know whether Rod Laver or Roger is the greatest.

I go for Roger though as his career coincided with other greats. Only a couple of the top 10 listed here could play with that.

Me thinks Laver would acquit himself better than 4 and be right there with 1. You have a computed list based on real facts, rather then opinions, here: Thought it is limited to Open Era, but has configurable weights so you can play with what you think is important.

I would argue that if Rafa was not injured he would actually have "less" titles. Reason being, you have to take it both ways. He has been able to achieve extraordinary success due to his willingness to extend himself beyond even what his body would allow him to.

Had he not exerted himself as much, he would have less Grand Slams. They all played in the same era where you have to have an all court game to succeed.

They will be the top 3 on the slams count and they all have career grand slams already. Rafael Nadal is without a doubt the greatest player ever!!!!

IF it wasnt for his injuries he would have won more than 20 Slams. Has anyone else achieved this? What other yardstick can be used to select the all-time best?

He is the best, phenomenal player of the Game. The best tennis player of all times without a doubt is Alan Dale Lee. The guys has more grand slams than the number of teeth in his mouth.

Just check him out. Djokovic should be above Sampras in my opinion. He reached a higher level with an obviously better well-rounded game.

He was better than Bjorn Borg they played in the same period and even ATP says about Ilie Nastase that he was the most talented tennis player of all time!

Obviously written by an American. There are a big list of players who should be above half this list, they just happen to not be Americans.

All these tennis players are great, I have no top pick, but I love Rafa for never giving up and grinding through ever tough match. I do not think there is any tennis player who can match his intensity and focus on court.

He also won on all surfaces - the Australian Open used to be played on grass when he won it. I would take Sampras out and put Wilander in.

Beyond the serve and volley kind of game that is possible on the fast surfaces, Sampras was only marginally above average on the slow courts.

Andy Murray should be on that top 10 list. Winning that many big trophies playing in the same era as Roger, Rafa and Novak is an enormous achievement.

Federer won 19 Grand Slams the vast majority of them prior to Nadal-Novak maturing and is record holder in 1 weeks. On the other hand, he had not beaten Nadal in any GS match for 10 years!

He holds negative H2Hs vs both his biggest rivals, and it was only in that he somewhat improved his devastating H2H vs Nadal.

Nadal holds a negative H2H vs Novak, with two streaks, the last of which included sets. An undisputed champion of clay, the best ever who played on that surface.

Novak is to be praised as he fought out his way to accompany these two - unbelievable and undisputed champions of their time - only to find his place on equal terms - holding a positive H2H vs both, having beaten both in each GS, including Rafa in RG and on any other Master-series clay court.

Novak has never beaten Rafa in RG final and overall lost there 6 times to him. Nole and Rafa played record 50 matches, Nole-Federer So, you see - unless you are a casual tennis fan who believes that his idol pees gold - it is not really that one player is truly the best ever.

I believe that this trio is something this sport have never seen and will likely never see again - as they have achieved what they did while constantly playing each other.

No more no less. Wimbledon , Federer lost QF to Tsonga. And so on and on On Aussie last time was on , after 7 long years.

Wimbledon after 5 years in In those years from to ,it was domination of Novak and Nadal. For me both Nadal and Djokovic have something more than Federer.

What this is, who knows.. Roger Federar is the Greatest and best tennis player of all time Federer should be number 1 by far!

A lot of tennis fans argue about the head to head against Nadal which ja in nadals favour But you need to look closer on this aspect. They played 15 times against each other on clay Federer is the better player on the other surfaces except clay.

If you take all the other stats into consideration year end number one, weeks number one, titles, consecutive semifinals and finals at slams there is on doubt that Roger is the GOAT!

See of remaining comments. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages and Hubbers authors may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.

To provide a better website experience, howtheyplay. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so. For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: Bill De Giulio more.

International Tennis Hall of Fame: November 2, Sydney, Australia Resides: Sydney, Australia Turned pro: April 29, Las Vegas, Nevada Resides: Las Vegas, Nevada Turned pro: February 16, Wiesbaden, West Germany Resides: New York City Turned pro: September 2, East St.

Santa Barbara, CA Turned pro: March 7, Ostrava, Czechoslovakia Resides: Goshen, Connecticut Turned pro: Stockholm, Sweden Turned pro: August 12, Potomac, Maryland Resides: Lake Sherwood, California Turned pro: August 8, Rockhampton, Queensland, Australia Resides: Carlsbad, California Turned pro: May 22, Belgrade, Serbia Resides: Monte Carlo, Monaco Turned pro: August 8, Basel, Switzerland Resides: Thank you to everyone for voting over the last 6 years - We are closing this poll in lieu of the newly expanded list of players.

Questions must be on-topic, written with proper grammar usage, and understandable to a wide audience. Is Federer facing difficulties with younger tennis players such as Anderson?

As of this moment I believe How would you rate Lleyton Hewitt? Any chance in the top 20 or 25 tennis players of all time?

Why is Andy Murray not on the list of greatest male tennis players? Do you believe Alexander Zverev will be on this list by the end of his career?

Where does Lew Hoad rank among the best tennis players of all-time? Why did tennis player Pete Sampras retire early?

Andy Murray has some work to do before he can be considered in the top 10 all-time. Did Roger Federer burn-out from playing tennis?

I was a big Andre Agassi - as above. Haha all crying because federer is number one instead of their favourite. I do not know who is the greatest, I only know that Djokovic with top game is the best.

Have you changed the list? Novak Djokovic Serbian terminator. Borg greatest combination of grass and clay talent; 11 GS in 10 short years 5.

Why on earth is tim henman not in the top 3?????? Also, as a side note, I think Nastase and Becker should also be in your list. Nadal is greatest ever Pancho Gonzalez was one heck of a player.

At least top 5. That said, Federer is the best ever and Rafa is not better. Nor would a player that is against him with 13 slams and only weeks at no.

Doing a little statistics shows you that if their matches had been played evenly across all surfaces, that their H2H would project to be Rafa Doing Statistics so that Roger would get to play 15 of the 38 on his best surface projects the H2H as Rafa Roger Federer is the best his gram slam awards speaks volume.

I seen Jimmy Connors in his days To win titles with three letters I think he should be no 7 not ivan lendl the cry baby.

Novak Djokovic beat Federer and Nadal a lot soo he is the best ever. There are list by each of the surfaces as well, and many more.

Same with Federer and Nadal. Federer is the best. Great ratings Roger Federer is surely the best no one can beat him. I hate Roger Federer Novak Djokovic is the best he beat him times.

This website uses cookies As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.

This is used to prevent bots and spam. This is used to detect comment spam. This is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized.

This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.

This is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. This is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos.

Javascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis. This is feature allows you to search the site.

Some articles have Google Maps embedded in them. This is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. This service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles.

No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. Some articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. Some articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them.

This is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal.

No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. You can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account.

No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. This supports the Maven widget and search functionality. This is an ad network. Google provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network.

We partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.

We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.

The Tennis Drill Book. The New York Times. Retrieved 2 February Rafael Nadal , page 13 Retrieved 13 September Retrieved 8 December Retrieved 3 May The Tiebreaker Is Introduced".

United States Tennis Association. Retrieved 22 July Feature - Murray knows real tragedy, he has the mettle to win his toughest battle.

La Liga to sponsor Davis Cup in latest cross-sport venture. Eurosport Live , where and when you want. Press conference in hysterics after Djokovic does impression of reporter.

Osaka cries after squandering match points, double faulting to concede set. See how Djokovic demolished Pouille in one-sided semi-final. Osaka regains compsoure to clinch title after wasting three match points.

Djokovic dominates Nadal to take title. Sabine Lisicki shocked as brutal ball girl stamps on bug. Sharapova withdraws from St Petersburg with shoulder injury.

A case of substance over style:

Tennis er - topic Interesting

Tennisspieler ist eine Weiterleitung auf diesen Artikel. Der andere, Roger Federer, überreichte sein Geschenk: ATP World Tour Er kann von einem Spieler gerufen werden, wenn dieser der Meinung ist, dass eine Entscheidung des Schiedsrichters die Tennisregeln verletzt. Setzposition bei den einzelnen Turnieren.

Tennis Er Video

Shahar Pe'er Tennis warrior

Buy Tickets for New York Open. Tickets for Wimbledon Buy Tickets. Tickets for Mutua Madrid Buy Tickets. How Maguire trumped Trump to reach the last four.

The worst shot Trump will play this season? Fluke helps Wilson whitewash Williams. Germany, Australia off to strong starts in Davis Cup qualifying.

Kvitova beaten by Vekic in St Petersburg quarter-finals. Sabalenka through to quarter-finals in St Petersburg.

Kvitova pushed hard in first match since Australian Open. Tennis-All roads lead to Madrid as new Davis Cup era dawns. Brady beats Garcia in Thailand Open.

Murray braced for final fight to save career after undergoing more hip surgery. Andy Murray undergoes hip resurfacing surgery. Katie Boulter eliminated in St Petersburg Open qualifying.

Five things we learnt as Djokovic and Osaka reigned Down Under. Motivated Djokovic sets sight on Federer with machine-like precision.

I think the edge would go to Roger Federer. I say this because as good as Rafa is, most of his Grand Slam titles came on the clay of Roland Garros.

Looking at their head to head matches Rafa holds a edge, but 13 of those victories came on clay. Federer holds the advantage on hard courts and grass.

How fortunate for us that we get to see two of the greatest players of all-time play. Enjoy it while it lasts.

I think Boris Becker is a top 15 player based on his career. He had six Grand Slam titles and three semi-final appearances in the French Open, which was certainly not his preferred surface.

Top 30, most definitely. I loved watching Hewitt play. He achieved some great results at a young age at a time when the level of competition was quite high.

Andy Murray is just in Grand Slam finals and has a losing record head-to-head against Federer, Djokovic, and Nadal. Granted he has two Olympic Gold Medals, but his results, while good, do not place him in my top ten all-time.

No, I do not feel that Boris Becker should be in the top three all-time. I think Becker, who certainly was a great player is more of a top 15 player all-time.

I have actually been considering including Rosewall in this top 10 list recently. I only saw him play at the end of his career, but after reviewing his record, I do think it would be appropriate to include him.

Look for an updated list in the next few weeks that will include Ken Rosewall. I debated whether to include Rosewall or Gonzalez in the top ten and certainly, a case can be made to include both.

Head to head Gonzalez had the advantage, but he was older and more experienced when Rosewall first started making a name for himself.

Both had long careers, well over titles, and were ranked number 1 in the world for many years. Perhaps at some point, I will re-evaluate? Roger or Rafa will probably go down as the greatest male tennis players of all time.

Certainly the current generation of players including Federer, Nadal, and Djokovic along with perhaps Murray and Wawrinka at times would be one.

Certainly a formidable collection of greats. And perhaps my favorite era, at least to watch, would be Connors, McEnroe, and Borg along with a few years later Wilander and then Lendl although he was really mid to late s.

The s really was a great time for tennis. As the years go by sometimes we tend to overlook or forget just how good the level of competition was.

I think the number of players capable of winning a Grand Slam title was probably never better than the s. I think John Newcombe is very close to the top 10 of all time.

Certainly, he is in the top 12 or 13 at worst, and some might even include him in the top Seven Grand Slam singles titles plus an amazing seventeen Grand Slam doubles titles are pretty impressive.

He has shown that he is capable of beating anyone including Federer and Djokovic. It was before my time, but it sounds like he could match it with Connors and the like.

Vilas was a great player. I had the pleasure of watching him play many times and he could certainly compete with anyone. I would probably place him in the top 20, maybe even top Grand Slam success, given its five-set nature, demonstrates how good your physical conditioning is, not how good a tennis player you are.

Best of three sets? How about just a single set and the winner moves on? Physical conditioning is just one part of the equation along with all of the other things that make a player great; speed, agility, mental toughness, shot selection, strategy, etc.

Do you feel the fact that playing surfaces are more similar than they used to be e. I think the best players will rise to the top no matter the surface.

Certainly some players excel on specific surfaces such as Nadal on clay and Federer on faster surfaces, but these players can compete on any surface.

I do think that Federer and Nadal are the cream of the crop, although it is difficult to compare players of different generations and playing styles.

I think Roger and Rafael are racking up more slams because they are playing longer and are able to maintain a high level of play despite aging.

Marcelo Rios was a very good player, just nowhere near the top 10 all-time. He was briefly ranked number 1 in the world in , but he failed to win a Grand Slam championship and has only 18 career titles to his resume.

His best Grand Slam result was reaching the finals of the Australian Open, which he lost to Petr Korda in straight sets.

Len Hoad had a great tennis career. Were it not for the back problems that plagued him during a good part of his playing days he could have produced even better results.

That said, he did win 4 Grand Slams as an amateur player in addition to the Pro Tournament of Champions. I would place Lew Hoad in the 15 to 20 range all-time.

Pete Sampras officially retired on August 25, at the age of 32, although his last match was at the US Open, which he won. Some players are capable of playing well into their thirties and despite still playing at a high level he had slowed a bit and decided to call it a career.

Good for him for ending his career on a high note with a Grand Slam title. Boris Becker was a great tennis player, just not top Top 15, most definitely.

No, Roger Federer is just being more selective with the tournaments that he enters. He has decided to skip the French Open to prepare for Wimbledon.

John McEnroe was a great tennis player. He won seven Grand Slam titles and was the number 1 ranked player in the world for weeks during his career.

I was fortunate to have been able to watch McEnroe during his entire career, and he had some memorable matches against the other greats of his era including Jimmy Connors, Bjorn Borg, and Ivan Lendl.

Sign in or sign up and post using a HubPages Network account. Comments are not for promoting your articles or other sites.

Federer is lucky he plays 2 Grand slams on his favourite surface grass. Medal only plays 1 Grand slam on his favourite surface every year.

Hence why Federer has won more Grand slams. Jimmy Connors was very disrespectful towards other players. So, according to my professional standards Jimmy should not be considered as a great professional but mediocre.

Similarly happens with other players as Novak Djokovic and Serena Williams. Professional conduct should also be taken into consideration when it comes to the final evaluation of a professional.

That is why, besides great accomplishments on court, I believe Roger Federer and Rafael Nadal should be considered two of the best tennis players.

Evaluating a tennis player it should also be considered the generations; tennis has changed in very many ways through time.

Now days, tennis is totally different as it was 60 years ago. That is why Rod Laver could very well be the best tennis player ever; besides his unparalleled accomplishments, he was a remarkable inspirational sport man.

People have to understand that the pro majors before the open era of were won by the best Tennis players. All pre pro majors should be of more value than the amateur majors.

Laver, Rosewall and Pancho Gonzales would be 1,2 and 3 of all time. If these three played in the in the Australian open, French open, Wimbledon and the US open from to Roy Emerson would have only won 2 majors.

You keep saying that Nadal is dominant on clay and if that is excluded then Federers record is better. Of course Nadal and Djokovic should be the better players now, Federer is 37 years old.

Imust be honest to say from reading all your comment you personally dont have the simplist idea of who is the GOAT.

If Federer is the greatest why cant he beat Nadal on Clay when in return Nadal had beaten him on all is favourite surfaces and more than ever Nadal injuries must be consider.

Have you taken into consideration that Novak Djokovic could very well has cheated in finals by distracting the opponents by appearing sick?

Novak did so in several matches against Rafa; it was very dispiriting. Fortunately, tennis players already know about this issue. Roger Federer - 20 GS titles, 98 titles overall, 6 tour finals, weeks as top1.

Rafael Nadal - some kind of "nemesis" to GOAT at this very moment, could be change in the future, as both of them are still active , second only to Roger in a number of GS titles.

Finest clay-court player of all time, indeed the "King of Clay". Reach his first title and his "prime" ealier then either Roger or Novak.

Will he became the GOAT? He has 3 less GS titles, but has more weeks on top1, better h2h with Rafa and 5 tour finals, while Rafa has 0.

Perhaps he should be indeed a top2. He has also as many slams as Novak. But we have to be fair, his number of weeks as top1, his 14 GS titles places him above Borg.

Ivan Lendl - was a top1 longer then Connors or McEnroe or Agassi or Borg at that point , despite the fact, that Connors have longer career.

Superior H2H to them excluding Borg. Connors has never won RG title, while Agassi has all of them. Stefan Edberg - another close one.

Obvious contenders for 10 are Wilander and Becker. I placed Edberg here only becouse of his number of GS titles combined with a number of weeks as a ranking leader.

Any of them would not be there if it would be a top10 of all times, since Laver is far greater then either of them; perhaps even all of them combine, basing on achivments.

This list is far better now. Last time I checked it Novak was number 5. I would mostly agree with this ranking, except for the presence of Pete Sampras.

Sampras was one of the most boring tennis players I ever witnessed in my 49 years. Marcelo Rios should be in this list instead.

Just my 2 cents. Federer is above Nadal because he is a far more consistent player with more slams and has a superior game in all assets except for heavy hitting.

Pancho Gonzalez, Ellworth Vines, and Don BUdge were the greatest players, Pancho number one, BUd Collins and Jack Kramer say this, with TIlden, and Laver a close second, then McEnroe, Pancho counting longevity, best on a given day, serving, et al, eight world pro championships in a row, beat Laver, when age 41 made semis at Wimbledon, none have matched his serve speed, accuracy, and percentage combines, best forehand, lobbed, speed, pole axed overheads.

They are all great but the list is too weighted to modern times. It would be like if you asked kids who was the greatest female performer in music history and they said Lady Gaga.

Hard to compare eras. And player will win all the GS the same year. Djokovic would have won more than 1 Roland Garos. He has the game for the clay If he wasnt in Nadal era who is with no doubt the best clay player ever, he would have won 3 or more by now.

Your basis for ranking is ridiculous. Why do people assume that hard courts should be the basis of the judgement. You note that Sampras did not do well on clay, but you fail to note that Federer and Djokovic only won one GS on clay and that only when Nadal was not around.

You suffer from the same ranking disease that most tennis people do - you judge without basis that clay court dominance should not really count.

Why you are always mentioning that Nadal and Novak has advantage compare to Federer in head to head because of years? Federer played against them when they were teenagers and he was in his prime.

Than he was supposed to make advantage and he did with Novak. Now it is, as you said opposite story. I think that it come to balance and Novak and Rafa proved that they are better.

Who on earth thinks that playing the role of "brick wall" deserves a vote anyways? NO "advantage over the last couple of years" not on this planet as I see.

Djokovic could be hit by a bus tomorrow. Nadal is a clay court player won 11 of his grand slam titles on clay only 6 on other surfaces.

There are 4 grand slam titles to be won every year 1 hard 1 clay 2 grass. If there were 2 hard 2 clay 2 grass would that mean both Nadal and Federer would have won twice the amount of clay and hard court titles.

If so Federer would be on 26 not However Nadal would be on 31 not Also in 3 year less time. Nadal is overall the best tennis player to grace a tennis court but not on grass.

I personally think Nadal is the bast ever tennis player at this point in time. Firstly Nadal turned pro as opposed to Federer who turned pro so has entered 76 gran slam tournaments Nadal has entered only 54 thats 22 less but only 3 gran slam titles behind.

This show up as a Head to head stand at 24 vs 15 to Nadal big difference eh. No one ever talks about Ivan Lendl.

He played in perhaps the most difficult era with the likes of McEnroe and Borg and even Connors and then Wilander, Becker, and Edberg as Sampras coming in.

This, in my opinion, leaves Djokovic and his all-around game as perhaps the best or second best and the one would have been right in the mix of best players of the 80s.

So the question begs: Placing Novak at 5 is malicious The guy won it all. He won all GS and Masters , and he is the first in history to have done it.

He is also the first man holding all four GS at the same time on 3 different surfaces and all that while the two from the list were there.

The first two from the list are trembling when they see him on the courth He beat both of them on their favourite surfaces. He is better tha Fed on Wimbledon 2 matches won in the final which is his home courth, He won against Nadal 7 consecutive matches two times He beat them so much that the world hates him Cuz they were very popular when he came on the scene.

In my opinion 1. With all respekt, but others from history were not on that level of tennis What exactly do these "all time greatest" top ten types of lists prove?

In my opinion absolutely nothing. There are too many variables to group all of these players into one bunch. Its like There are only Slams for this guy.

And the Guy places him ahead of djokovic. When Nadal entered the real tennis games played. He can play great tennis on any surface and he is complete alrounder player in every stroke.

Nadal is undoubtedly the best player ever. Federer took advantage of Nadal mishaps to obtain more grand slams.

But the record shows head to head Nadal has beaten him eight times more. Federer never won the Olympics, never won the Davis Cup.

Not just that, he won 13 GS titles while those 2 were active. This is a wonderful list and comparison, Bill. Although, there are a number of other wonderful players I think you have selected the best ten.

I also feel at the time of writing Roger Federer has to be regarded as the best, despite Djokovic defeating Nadal in the Wimbledon semi-final and Federer being knocked out by Kevin Anderson.

Djokovic could possibly go on to eclipse Federer in time but injuries could play a part.. I think the argument for "GOAT" is highly subjective and difficult to quantify.

Federer has 20 grand slam titles and the most weeks at 1st, but Federer began to accumulate these accomplishments with relatively easy competition Safin, Roddick, Coria, Nalbadian, etc.

Federer had already won 4 Grand Slam titles and began accumulating his 1st place weeks - before Nadal was 18 years old. Once Nadal came in to the picture, the "Federer dominance" quickly changed.

Just look at the level of competition he has faced. From the onset, he has faced Federer at his best, only to keep competing with him while Djokovic went on to hit his prime as well.

Nadal, and Djokovic as well, have faced the toughest level of competition that any tennis player has ever seen. Both have always had 2 elite level, top players of all time standing between them and the Grand Slam titles.

Federer had an easy start. I asked this question above and it was answered, but I still think that the homogenization of playing surfaces today make it easier for modern players to accumulate slams.

In other words, grass is not as fast as it used to be and I believe but am not sure the clay is not as slow. I think Nadal would have had a tougher time winning Wimbledon on a 90s Wimbledon surface, for instance.

Consequently, I think the modern players are overrated a bit compared to the greats of yesteryear. When I asked this question, the author essentially responded that the best players rise to the top no matter the surface.

However, I think lowering the differences between playing surfaces undoubtedly helps the modern player. Laver could be considered the best ever, honestly..

H2H is really not a very relevant argument unless you have nearly identical achievements and your matches account for all scenarios.

Nor would a player that is against him, with half as many weeks at 1 and half as many slams It goes on and on until you eventually get Rafael Nadal.

I hate when people use the H2H argument to say that Rafa is better. Not only has he had a significant advantage 15 of 38 matched have been on clay , but he is on clay and on every other surface vs fed, The only thing that H2H displays is that Rafa is significantly better than Federer on clay, but we already knew that He even has 45 more weeks at no.

You see, H2H is totally unfair and unnecessary unless you are using it as a tiebreak condition. As it stands, the career achievements between Rafa and Federer are not a tie.

Even then, remember that Nadal has been fortunate to play 15 of their 38 matches on his best surface, while Roger has only been able to play 3 of their matches on his best surface.

Doing a little statistics shows you that if their matches had been played evenly across all surfaces, that their H2H would project to be. Doing Statistics so that Roger would get to play 15 of the 38 on his best surface projects the H2H as.

No one should use H2H unless every other indicator is basically tied Or would it be Andy Roddick whos against Novak? Federer is certainly one of the greats and has the best overall record, but if, like in boxing, you have a Nadal is the GOAT.

Greatest player at Australian is novak greatest tennis player and my favorite rafa at French open and legend of tennis fedrer at Wimbledon and usopen champion yet To win titles with three letters I think he should be no 7 not ivan lendl the cry baby.

Why is Rob Laver ranked 3 at all. He should be lower. Borg should be above him. Yes he won the gram slams twice but writers failed to say that 3 of those GS were played on grass and only Roland Garros was played on dirt.

Also Sampras should be lower too since he couldnt play on clay at all. He was a one trick pony with a fast serve. Roger Federer is not only the greatest Tennis player ever, he is the greatest athlete of all time too.

I think Pancho Gonzalez was the great est tennis player of all time. He was the best in the world for about 10 years. Unfortunately, the professionals were not able to play in the major championships until he was 40 years old.

We will never know whether Rod Laver or Roger is the greatest. I go for Roger though as his career coincided with other greats. Only a couple of the top 10 listed here could play with that.

Me thinks Laver would acquit himself better than 4 and be right there with 1. You have a computed list based on real facts, rather then opinions, here: Thought it is limited to Open Era, but has configurable weights so you can play with what you think is important.

I would argue that if Rafa was not injured he would actually have "less" titles. Reason being, you have to take it both ways. He has been able to achieve extraordinary success due to his willingness to extend himself beyond even what his body would allow him to.

Had he not exerted himself as much, he would have less Grand Slams. They all played in the same era where you have to have an all court game to succeed.

They will be the top 3 on the slams count and they all have career grand slams already. Rafael Nadal is without a doubt the greatest player ever!!!!

IF it wasnt for his injuries he would have won more than 20 Slams. Has anyone else achieved this? What other yardstick can be used to select the all-time best?

He is the best, phenomenal player of the Game. The best tennis player of all times without a doubt is Alan Dale Lee. The guys has more grand slams than the number of teeth in his mouth.

Just check him out. Djokovic should be above Sampras in my opinion.

2 thought on “Tennis er”

  1. Faeramar says:

    Ich meine, dass Sie nicht recht sind. Schreiben Sie mir in PM, wir werden umgehen.

  2. Gardagore says:

    Welche Wörter... Toll, die ausgezeichnete Phrase

Hinterlasse eine Antwort

Deine E-Mail-Adresse wird nicht veröffentlicht. Erforderliche Felder sind markiert *